Pubblicazioni

Imatinib-Treated CML Patients With Discordant Response Between Cytogenetic and Molecular Tests At 3 and 6 Month Timepoints Have a Reduced Probability Of Subsequent Optimal Response: A Study From The “Gruppo Triveneto LMC”  (2013)

Autori:
Bonifacio, Massimiliano; Gianni, Binotto; Mario, Tiribelli; Elisabetta, Calistri; Elena, Maino; Roberta, Zanotti; Luca, Frison; Luciana, Marin; Renato, Fanin; Gianpietro, Semenzato; Giovanni, Pizzolo
Titolo:
Imatinib-Treated CML Patients With Discordant Response Between Cytogenetic and Molecular Tests At 3 and 6 Month Timepoints Have a Reduced Probability Of Subsequent Optimal Response: A Study From The “Gruppo Triveneto LMC”
Anno:
2013
Tipologia prodotto:
Contributo in atti di convegno
Tipologia ANVUR:
Contributo in Atti di convegno
Lingua:
Inglese
Formato:
A Stampa
Referee:
No
Nome rivista:
Blood
ISSN Rivista:
0006-4971
N° Volume:
122
Titolo del Convegno:
ASH
Luogo:
New Orleans
Periodo:
dicembre
Editore:
American Society of Hematology
Casa editrice:
American Society of Hematology
Intervallo pagine:
2732-2732
Parole chiave:
chronic myeloid leukemia; imatinib; European LeukemiaNet; cytogenetic; molecular markers
Breve descrizione dei contenuti:
Introduction. The 2013 version of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients defines as optimal response the achievement of at least a partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) and/or BCR-ABL <=10% at 3 months, and of a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and/or BCR-ABL<1% at 6 months. Obtaining less than PCyR (i.e. Ph+ 36-95%) and/or BCR-ABL >10% at 3 months, and less than CCyR and/or BCR-ABL 1-10% at 6 months are regarded as warning. Patiens with discordant response between cytogenetic and molecular tests (e.g. PCyR and BCR-ABL >10% at 3 months) may be alternatively considered at the same timepoint as optimal or warning. Aims and Methods To evaluate the outcome of CML patients with discordant results between cytogenetic and molecular tests, we retrospectively analyzed our cohort of early chronic phase CML patients for which both cytogenetic and molecular responses were evaluable at 3 and/or 6 months. All patients received front-line imatinib 400 mg daily. PCyR and CCyR were defined as 1-35% and 0% Ph+ metaphases, respectively; major molecular response (MMR) was defined as BCR-ABL <=0.1%IS. Failure-free survival (FFS) was measured from the start of imatinib to the date of any of the following events: progression to accelerated or blastic phase (ABP), death for any cause at any time, imatinib dose increase (>=600 mg/day) or switch to nilotinib/dasatinib for primary or secondary hematologic or cytogenetic resistance. Cumulative responses and survival probabilities were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log rank test; differences among variables were evaluated by the Fisher's exact test. Results A total of 201 patients were analyzed. Median age at diagnosis was 55 (range 20-84) years. The distribution according to the Sokal score was: 86 (42.8%), 79 (39.3%) and 36 (17.9%) patients for low, intermediate and high risk, respectively. We observed that patients with concordant optimal (n=110) and discordant (n=19) results at the 3 month timepoint had significantly different chances of subsequent 6-month CCyR (88% vs 40%, p<.0001) and 12-month MMR (68% vs 12%, p<.0001), while there were no significant differences between patients with discordant or concordant warning (n=21) results (6-month CCyR 40% vs 14% and 12-month MMR 12% vs 0%, respectively). Also, patients with discordant results, compared to concordant optimal patients, had a significantly longer median time to CCyR (10.5 vs 3.5 months, p<.0001) and to MMR (49.6 vs 9.1 months, p<.0001), while there were no differences between discordant and concordant warning patients. Similarly, considering the 6-month timepoint, patients with discordant (n=28) results had a significantly inferior probability of subsequent 12-month MMR compared to concordant optimal (n=104) patients (16% vs 82%, p<.0001) but not different from concordant warning (n=38) cases (7%). Long-term FFS was significantly different between concordant optimal, discordant and concordant warning patients both considering the 3-month (82.8% vs 52.7% vs 9.6%, respectively) and the 6-month (90.4% vs 67.9% vs 23.7%, respectively) timepoints. Conclusions Our results suggest that only CML patients with concordant cytogenetic and molecular optimal response at the earlier timepoints have an excellent probability of obtaining subsequent MMR and a favourable long-term FFS, while patients with at least one warning result should be carefully monitored, since their risk of treatment failure is higher.
Id prodotto:
86033
Handle IRIS:
11562/893584
depositato il:
15 febbraio 2015
ultima modifica:
12 novembre 2022
Citazione bibliografica:
Bonifacio, Massimiliano; Gianni, Binotto; Mario, Tiribelli; Elisabetta, Calistri; Elena, Maino; Roberta, Zanotti; Luca, Frison; Luciana, Marin; Renato, Fanin; Gianpietro, Semenzato; Giovanni, Pizzolo, Imatinib-Treated CML Patients With Discordant Response Between Cytogenetic and Molecular Tests At 3 and 6 Month Timepoints Have a Reduced Probability Of Subsequent Optimal Response: A Study From The “Gruppo Triveneto LMC” in «Blood» vol. 122 American Society of HematologyAtti di "ASH" , New Orleans , dicembre , 2013pp. 2732-2732

Consulta la scheda completa presente nel repository istituzionale della Ricerca di Ateneo IRIS

<<indietro

Attività

Strutture

Condividi